Oops!

It appears that you don't have Flash Player installed.

Photo Gallery  
tools
this week
Customer 'Don't Care'?
Credit
web guide

Justice Project SA
087 809 0399
website

JMPDebt


The Johannesburg Metro Police Department or JMPD appears to be using scare tactics to rake in unpaid traffic fines dating back more than two years.

Ugen Vos (Journalist): 'They tell you quite bluntly that you will go to jail if you don't pay these fines.'

Ugen Vos is a journalist with the Citizen newspaper.

In February, he received an email from what appeared to be the JMPD.

He called the phone number printed on the letter.

[On phone] Woman (Call centre): 'Welcome to JMPD Traffic Fines.'

Ugen: 'When you get through to the call centre, all indications are that you are speaking directly to JMPD.'

In reality, Ugen had rung the call centre of a private debt collecting agency, VVM Collections in Randburg.

The address on the email he received, 'jmpd@traffic-fine.co.za', belongs to this company.

According to the call centre, he had outstanding traffic fines of R2 800 and dating back to 2007.

Ugen: 'There were 20 fines that I had never seen in my life.'

Ugen wrote a news story questioning the legality of letters pretending to be from the JMPD and emailed to motorists. On the mails are the JMPD logo, payment details and the scanned signature of the director for licensing and prosecution, Gerry Gerneke.

Devi Sankaree Govender (Carte Blanche Consumer presenter): 'When Ugen's article appeared in the Citizen, he was inundated with letters from readers all telling the same story.'

All believed it was some sort of scam.

Howard Dembovsky (Justice Project South Africa): 'For that reason we started investigating the matter.'

Howard Dembovsky from the Justice Project South Africa, which deals with power abuse within law enforcement, contacted the Jo'burg Metro Police Department.

Devi: 'What did you find out?'

Howard: 'That this was perfectly legitimate. They are acting on behalf of the JMPD.'

Devi: 'Are these real fines?'

Howard: 'A lot of them are, yes.'

JMPD Director Gerrie Gerneke says they hired VVM to help update their records because their traffic information system, eNaTIS, contained so many incorrect addresses and contact details it was difficult to notify offenders.

Director Gerrie Gerneke (Johannesburg Metro Police Department): 'That is the only database that we have got currently and we find that to be inadequate.'

As registered debt collectors, VVM were able to access databases used by credit bureaus. They matched this information to those with unpaid fines and sent out letters of demand.

When concerned motorists responded, the call centre operators were able to verify their details.

[On phone] Woman (Call centre): 'Kindly can you confirm your husband's cellphone number.'

Dir Gerneke: 'We then decided to hand over as a test case 1.2-million cases that we were unable to serve a Section 54 notice on at the last known address.'

To date, over 100 000 fines have been paid, totalling R20-million.

And, while it may seem like a smart plan - updating data and at the same time raking in the revenue, motorists suspect they are being taken for a ride.

Ugen: 'The law is supposed to be there to serve the ends of justice. And is this just? Is this fair? Is this an equitable way to do traffic enforcement?'

Devi: 'Legal experts say the JMPD are stripping drivers of their right to a fair process by taking shortcuts in the traffic fine collection system.'

Advocate Andries Cornelius is from the Debt Collectors Council of South Africa.

Devi: 'What would the standard procedure be when somebody gets a traffic fine?

Advocate Andries Cornelius (Council for Debt Collectors): 'Initially you would see the notice in terms of Section 341 of the Criminal Procedure Act. That notice is an invitation to a transgressor to pay an amount in order not to be criminally prosecuted.'

This is the letter that is posted to you [on screen].

If the motorist doesn't receive this letter, or doesn't pay this admission of guilt within 30 days, a summons will be issued.

Andries: 'It means that an individual who is authorised to serve that document on you will visit you at home or at your place of work and he'll hand you the summons.'

At this point, motorists can choose to pay or appear in court on the date stipulated in the summons. In court they can either challenge the fine, or ask to pay a reduced amount.

Andries: 'He then has to attend the court proceedings on the date as is set out in the summons. Failure to do that will result in the Magistrate issuing a warrant for his arrest.'

But none of this is explained in the letter sent to motorists by the JMPD via VVM.

Ugen: 'I did ask them if I could contest the fines and I was told that basically my only option was to pay them immediately.'

We called the VVM call centre to ask what would happen if we refused to pay an admission of guilt.

Devi: 'And what happens if we don't pay it?'

[On phone] Daphne (Call centre): 'A warrant of arrest will be issued.'

Devi: 'Immediately?'

[On phone] Daphne: 'Yes.'

Andries says this is illegal.

The email, threatening motorists with criminal proceedings, attempts to create a new process in the legal traffic fine system.

Andries: 'Now the Criminal Procedure Act does not make provision for such a process.'

Devi: 'According to the Council for Debt Collectors, debt collectors are not allowed to misrepresent themselves. They are also not allowed to make threats they have no legal authority to enforce.'

Andries: 'He also - when he sends out anything in writing, any correspondence - he has to attach his registration number, his council of debt collectors registration number.'

No such number appears on the email. And it seems the standard procedure for phone operators at VVM's call centre is to intimidate motorists into paying.

Devi (on phone): 'What happens if he gets stopped in a roadblock and they see that he's got this fine outstanding?'

[On phone] Daphne: 'Because there is no arrangement that I have logged on the system, he's just going to be arrested immediately.'

Howard: 'So, you pay it because you are scared that you are going to be locked up. There is actually a term for that - and we apply it to Nigerian syndicates, we apply it to the Mafia, and we call it 'extortion'.'

Devi: 'The reality is that you can only be arrested if the police are able to produce this... (on screen). It's a warrant for arrest at the time of your arrest.'

Andries: 'You cannot be arrested on the basis that you did not pay your admission of guilt fines.'

And when it comes to fines older than two years, it is unlikely that the Johannesburg courts will issue a summons.

Although there is no statute of limitations on traffic fines, hundreds of thousands of extra summonses would mean lots of extra cases for the courts, which are already over-burdened.

Devi (to Dir. Gereke): 'The threat that's contained in the letter makes it very clear that failure to make payment before x date will result in criminal proceedings being instituted against you. This is actually not true - it's a lie, it's illegal. Yet your signature is at the bottom of the letter?'

Dir Gerneke: 'Devi, I don't see that as a lie. It is very clearly worded may... it, it is not that we are going to lock you up.'

Devi: 'You just said it's not going to happen. If it's two years old, it's not going to happen.'

In at least one case, the fine in question didn't even exist.

Howard: 'This is an example of a chap who got a phone call telling him that he had an outstanding traffic fine and he had until the end of the day to pay it, or he was going to be arrested.'

Howard asked the JMPD's head office to check for outstanding fines against the motorist's ID number. There [was] none.

Nor did Payfine have a record of a fine.

Devi: 'Does the fine exist or not?'

Dir. Gerneke: 'Well, if VVM have got the letter, the fine definitely existed at one stage or another. It could be that this fine was just on the point of being cleaned off the system, being older than three years.'

But when the Justice Project called VVM on the motorist's behalf, they were told unless he paid he would be arrested.

Journalist: 'How much is it?'

[On phone] Woman (Call centre):'R200!'

Devi: 'You're just hoping that they're going to read this, get a 'skrik' (fright) and pay up.'

Dir Gerneke: 'Let's be honest Devi, I'm, I'm sure at the end of the [day] we must all look at the, the, the City's interest in, um...'

Devi: 'In terms of money?'

Dir Gerneke: 'In terms of money. That was part of the turnaround strategy of the City.'

Devi: 'But don't make money out of me if you didn't do your job and I didn't get the notice.'

Ugen: 'The general impression that I get is that JMPD is scratching for funding.'

Devi (to Dr. Gereke): 'I want to understand. VVM... how do they get paid?'

Dir. Gerneke: 'They will get paid in terms of a percentage of all the fines that have been paid.'

Devi: 'Which is why they do threaten you on the phone that you will be arrested, because the more fines they get in, the more money they will make.'

To date VVM has earned R2-million in commission. And it seems they are fleecing motorists twice.

The number given as the JMPD call centre on their email is a premium rate number.

Howard: 'It costs you the same as phoning a cellphone, so whatever rate you are on is the rate that you are paying. So if you are being charged R2.30 per minute...'

Devi: 'So not only are they making money out of collecting fines, they are also?'

Howard: 'And it is illegal. It is illegal in any situation to give people a telephone number and not inform them that it is a premium rate number.'

Devi: 'And do you know that this specific call centre makes money out of my calls?'

Dir Gerneke: 'No, that I'm not uh, uh too sure of, of how they make money...'

Devi: 'They make money out of the calls.'

Devi: 'We wanted to put our questions to VVM Inc. But despite an email and telephone calls and even coming to their office here in Randburg, Johannesburg, nobody in authority wants to speak to us.'

Woman (VVM Reception): 'All the important people is (sic) not here.'

Devi: 'Even if I get a cell number and I can call Wednesday or something and do an interview over the telephone...'

The receptionist at VVM refused to give us the company director's cell numbers and we are still waiting for any kind of response.

Devi: 'So, to people who have received letters and they go and check and they find that fine is actually more than two or more years old, all they must do is just update their details and forget about the fine?'

Dir Gerneke: 'Technically that is what they can do. But remember it's still a legal fine. If it's over two years, we will not serve a summons at a roadblock on them - they cannot be arrested for this letter, and that we must make very clear. But legally you can still pay the fine if you want to.'


IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER:
While every attempt has been made to ensure this transcript or summary is accurate, Carte Blanche or its agents cannot be held liable for any claims arising out of inaccuracies caused by human error or electronic fault. This transcript was typed from a transcription recording unit and not from an original script, so due to the possibility of mishearing and the difficulty, in some cases, of identifying individual speakers, errors cannot be ruled out.
Comments
ChantelleNeil 19:39 - 03 Jun 10
ChantelleNeil
I found the story very weak, you cannot blame the JMP for going to these measures. While i understand that threat tactics are not the way to go, they are in this position because of the licence holder who fails to update there residential address. And to say that times are tough as an excuse for not paying your fine is shocking as perhaps the licence holder shouldn't be speeding in the fist place, at some point South Africans need to start taking responsibility for breaking the law!
   
Anonymous 19:46 - 03 Jun 10
Anonymous
So Chantelle, MAKING UP FINES like VVM did is OK with you? What a strange attitude you have.
   
Anonymous 21:06 - 03 Jun 10
Anonymous
I agree with Chantelle - for goodness sake Devi how can you condone people speeding, then dodging their fines for two years and skipping away scott free!! If you speed PAY YOR FINE!!!
   
Anonymous 21:18 - 03 Jun 10
Anonymous
I am also in agreement with Chantelle,lawlessness in our country and on our roads needs to stop. We have to protect our loved ones
   
Anonymous 21:32 - 03 Jun 10
Anonymous
I am a law abiding driver. I believe that speed kills. If you choose to speed you must face up to the fine. Why should you get away just because you ducked the authorities for 2 years.PAY YOUR FINES!!
   
Anonymous 08:20 - 04 Jun 10
Anonymous
Yes. If you have broken the law- PAY! BUT, the JMPD must not extort money out of inocent people by fraudulent means! VVM is operating illegally and this is tantamount to FRAUD! Joburgers, wake up!
   
JPSA 08:54 - 04 Jun 10
JPSA
It is really easy for one to say "I am a law-abiding driver" but it may surprise you to know that there are only a handful of traffic law experts in SA and NONE of these are ordinary members of the public. There are 2055 charges in the AARTO chargebook and around 90 of these are speed-related. Of those, only around 40% apply to drivers of cars/bikes. Just because traffic authorities choose to focus on speed does not mean that there are no other laws except "keep left - pass right & don't speed".
   
JPSA 09:03 - 04 Jun 10
JPSA
The other issue is this. Sect 341 notices fall under the Criminal Procedures Act and therefore should not be dealt with civilly. Debt collectors have NO RIGHT to threaten ANYONE with arrest - even police may not threaten. What VVM has done constitutes a criminal offence as well as a transgression of legal ethical practice. Yes, if you have transgressed, own up to it and pay up, but obviously you need to receive the notice in the first place. Just saying it was posted is simply not good enough.
   
Anonymous 13:05 - 04 Jun 10
Anonymous
I believe that rules are meant to be obeyed and if not, there are consequences. People are up in arms because they disregarded the law. The traffic rules were created for safety. C'mon, get real ppl!!
   
Anonymous 13:32 - 04 Jun 10
Anonymous
There are lawless drivers-Agreed,BUT, Warrants that never arrive or not up to date databases are concerning. Incorrect fines and the incompetence of the JMPD let alone the courts.
   
Anonymous 13:52 - 04 Jun 10
Anonymous
what happens if you are stupid enough to pay money through to a so called debt collector. and you were conned!!!! so you still have the fines & now out of pocket too
   
Anonymous 15:27 - 04 Jun 10
Anonymous
I have no prob paying fines - but I do have a prob when our own law-enforcers can't even sort out incorrect fines - what a joke! Go Devi - these jokers need to be held accountable as I pay their sal
   
Anonymous 16:21 - 04 Jun 10
Anonymous
Extortion HA! Did you notice the bloke Devi felt so sorry for never actually said the fines weren't his, he was just sore because they finally caught up with him.......
   
JPSA 16:46 - 04 Jun 10
JPSA
Is it not amazing that the only two parties that have not remained anonymous are Chantelle and us? It is very easy to hide behind a wall and throw stones (or operate cameras) but less easy to stand up and take responsibility for what you say and do. We salute Chantelle for having the courage of her convictions, even though we disagree with what she said - That is what debate is all about. But this page is starting to look very much like it is being commented on by VVM & JMPD, and that is sad.
   
Anonymous 06:41 - 05 Jun 10
Anonymous
People must pay their fines. GO JMPD!! GO VVM!!
   
JMPDVVM 16:38 - 09 Jun 10
JMPDVVM
VVM is concerned about the misinformation that is being disseminated about the company and its operations – it borders on a smear campaign. All VVM’s operations are open to scrutiny. The company has been in existing for more than 20 years and makes a massive contribution towards healthy credit management. For all the facts and a detailed response to the Carte Blanche programme on JMPD Debt, visit www.vvm.co.za.
   
Anonymous 16:35 - 05 Jul 10
Anonymous
The JMPD started with their sms's again regarding fines that is older than two years - whereto from here?
   
200ts 08:15 - 24 Aug 10
200ts
U know what, JMPD should stop hiding in the bushes trapping motorists and get on the streets and fight the real crime, robberies etc etc. Its easy to pick on soft targets. The point of trapping is to reduce speeding by being visible. Hiding in the bushes defeats that purpose. Do it right or do not do it at all. but its a multimillion rand business so what is one to do. I was given a fine for driving on a bus lane that was not marked as a bus lane jmpd are morons!
   
Anonymous 08:38 - 24 Aug 10
Anonymous
I see everyone has made some harsh outbursts, but many fail to realize that with all the corruption and extortion going on, innocent people are being threatened and/or arrested for this.
   
Anonymous 08:40 - 24 Aug 10
Anonymous
What if it happened to you. And VVM was threatening you? Bear in mind the fine they are using is a fine that a false/fake.What is your attitude going to be? "Oh, I drove to fast, I must pay the fine?"
   
Anonymous 08:43 - 24 Aug 10
Anonymous
People, seriously, some of the comments are seriously a joke. Some of you are commenting without thinking further than your noses. I agree with JPSA. Illegal methods are out of the question.
   
Anonymous 08:45 - 24 Aug 10
Anonymous
There are also rules to the camera's any traffic department places. Maybe many of you should go and read them, I have seen a traffic dept, break laws to make a couple of Rands.
   
Anonymous 13:00 - 24 Aug 10
Anonymous
What ever happened to updating your address when renewing your vehicle licence as well as being informed of outstanding fines then and not being able to renew until the fines were sorted out? From DD
   
Anonymous 14:55 - 24 Aug 10
Anonymous
Motorists need to fess up & pay for their transgressions, but we cant be subjected to extortive methods to pay. What happened to the system of linking it to your vehicle license?? expose them Devi
   
Wynie1 15:34 - 24 Aug 10
Wynie1
I got a speeding fine that i feel is not on, the officer was very unprofetional when i told him i were not over my speedlimit. it was on a 60 zone and on my odometer it was 60 and when i told him this he started shouting and making remarks, when i told him that his attitude was not of a proffetional trafic officer he then told me that my attitude stinks, is this now how the trafic department works. I went to elsburg trafic dep and there was no help when i went to complain about this.
   
Wynie1 15:51 - 24 Aug 10
Wynie1
I got a speeding fine that i feel is not on, the officer was very unprofetional when i told him i were not over my speedlimit. it was on a 60 zone and on my odometer it was 60 and when i told him this he started shouting and making remarks, when i told him that his attitude was not of a proffetional trafic officer he then told me that my attitude stinks, is this now how the trafic department works. I went to elsburg trafic dep and there was no help when i went to complain about this.
   
Wynie1 15:56 - 24 Aug 10
Wynie1
I would really like to hear from you is this acceptable for a officer of the law to treat you like that
   

Comments published on the Web site by users of the Web site are the users' own and do not necessarily represent the views of the Group, nor does the Group endorse these views. For the purposes of this clause, any reference to the Group shall be deemed to also include the employees, officers, directors, representatives, agents, shareholders, affiliates, advisers, service providers, suppliers and content providers of the Group
Want to comment?
Username:
Password:
    Forgot your password?
  Not yet registered?
Click here, it’s free!
No myMNET login? Leave a shorter message here:
Your Email:
Your comment:(200 Character/s left)

To Leave a longer message please log in to myMNET first.
        
myMnet
Recent Activity
RRobinson Has Commented on an Article
RRobinson Has Commented on an Article
renierjvr Has Commented on an Article
renierjvr Has Commented on an Article
renierjvr Has Commented on an Article
renierjvr Has Commented on an Article
Win